ENDA Hearing

Support the ENDA Congressional Hearing on Weds, Sept 23, 2009.

Join the “Hearing on Inclusive ENDA” Facebook group, and get info on how to contact the committee members in and near your state.

Go to http://bit.ly/1ji00k for more information.

We are rapidly moving towards a vote. Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of their party.

Jillian T. Weiss
Co-Chair, Inclusive ENDA

More ENDA links:

US Reps ENDA Spreadsheet: http://bit.ly/Q5YMJ
US Senate ENDA Spreadsheet: http://bit.ly/14TDll

Unconfirmed US Reps contact info: http://bit.ly/NUFUd
Unconfirmed US Senator contact info: http://bit.ly/45WGMc

Jeez Louise This Whole Cisgender Thing

Since Alex Blaze took it on, & since we’ve been discussing this whole “is it okay to call someone who isn’t trans cisgender?” question on the boards, I may as well put it down here.

First, I’m going to claim a difference between cisgender & cissexual. Cisgender, the problem seems to me, is not the easy opposite of transgender. Cisgender implies, or means, or could mean (depending on who you talk to), that someone’s sex and gender are concordant. So your average butch woman, who is not trans, or is, depending on how she feels about it (see Bear Bergman), is now somehow cisgender. So is someone like me. So is a femme-y gay man who maybe performs a more gender normative masculinity for his job. That is, those of us who have variable genders, who maybe are gender fluid or gender neutral but who don’t identify as trans, are now somehow cisgender.

& Honestly, that’s bullshit. There’s a reason I use GVETGI to describe myself = Gender Variant Enough To Get It, is what it stands for.

So there’s the first issue, that “cis” may stand for “cisgender” and it may stand for “cissexual” but no one knows for sure which it is when it’s abbreviated. Crossdressers, for instance, are cissexual but they’re not cisgender. For instance.

Then there’s that little usage/connotation/denotation problem.

Telling me, & other partners whose lives are profoundly impacted by the legal rights / cultural perceptions of trans people, that we are “not trans” implies that we are also not part of the trans community. I’ve been saying for years now that we are. When trans people are killed, harassed, not hired, fired due to discrimination, denied health care, etc. etc. etc., their loved ones suffer along with them. Their families, their lovers, their kids especially. We are not just “allies.” We are vested, dammit, & a part of the trans community, so when “cisgender” comes to mean, or is used to mean, “not part of the trans community,” we are once again left out in the dark.

(Somehow, I can’t help thinking of the muggles & mudbloods of Harry Potter, here. Partners are the equivalent of the kids born to magical families who are not themselves magical. In the books & movies, they are part of the magical community, & without question. Ahem.) Continue reading “Jeez Louise This Whole Cisgender Thing”

Southern Comfort: New Documentary

10 years ago, the award winning film Southern Comfort followed the last year in the life of transman Robert Eads as he died from ovarian cancer. Ten years later the film is still being shown around the world, and a new documentary is now in production. Robert’s death was a result of many factors, but the fact that he could not find a doctor to treat him ranks very high on the list. Your help is needed to promote better health care for trans people so no one else need die because of lack of medical care. This new documentary will address the changes in health care for trans people, as well as the lack of change within the last ten years since Robert’s death.

Please help by making a donation.

Rachel & Lawrence

As of today, my lovely partner is the official Web Content and New Media Coordinator for Lawrence University.

In other words, she got a job at the very same university that has been employing yours truly as a teacher for the past few years.

Nurture vs. Nurture

Another cool article that puts the whole “everything is genetically pre-determined” argument into perspective:

Yet there are differences in adults’ brains, and here Eliot is at her most original and persuasive: explaining how they arise from tiny sex differences in infancy. For instance, baby boys are more irritable than girls. That makes parents likely to interact less with their “nonsocial” sons, which could cause the sexes’ developmental pathways to diverge. By 4 months of age, boys and girls differ in how much eye contact they make, and differences in sociability, emotional expressivity, and verbal ability—all of which depend on interactions with parents—grow throughout childhood. The message that sons are wired to be nonverbal and emotionally distant thus becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The sexes “start out a little bit different” in fussiness, says Eliot, and parents “react differently to them,” producing the differences seen in adults.

The book is called Pink Brain, Blue Brain, & it’s by Lise Eliot. I’m looking forward to checking it out.

First Day of Classes

Tomorrow is the first day of classes here at Lawrence, and I’m teaching Gender Studies 100. We’re starting with a discussion of Caster Semenya, of course, so that we can talk a little bit about the way gender studies people view a story like hers. It introduces stuff like the binary, genetic/chromosomal sexing, gender stereotypes, etc.

I’m looking forward to it. This course is co-taught, and my co-teacher is from Physics this year, which means plenty of science students. Should be entertaining.