One Reply to “ENDA Hearings”

  1. I found the testimony of Camille Olson particularly interesting in terms of the shortcomings of the ENDA language as written now and its potential impact on the obligations of employers and employees … She points out needed clarifications and, of course!, all the stuff about toilet/restroom/bathroom issues … nothing to sneeze at.

    AND, the mixture in the language and in legal precedents about the conflation or distinctions about “sex” and “gender” usage. I understand that Helen has a clear
    preference for conflation, but you know how lawyers are …


Leave a Reply