<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>en&#124;Gender &#187; feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/category/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com</link>
	<description>helen boyd&#039;s journal of gender &#38; trans issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Komen News: Not So Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/02/03/komen-news-not-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/02/03/komen-news-not-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[komen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yay, everyone&#8217;s happy Komen changed their decision. But I am a cynical, suspicious type, and I read their statement, which says: &#8220;We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/02/03/komen-news-not-so-fast/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, everyone&#8217;s happy <a href="https://seamus.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/02/03/146344674/in-reversal-komen-reinstates-funding-for-planned-parenthood?sc=nl&#038;cc=brk-20120203-1139Our">Komen changed their decision</a>. But I am a cynical, suspicious type, and I read their statement, which says:</p>
<p>&#8220;We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.&#8221;</p>
<p>That last bit, the &#8220;while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions&#8221; just left a back door, wide, wide open. By which I mean, Komen just figured out a way to say, the next time they don&#8217;t fund Planned Parenthood, that their FUNDERS choose not to. And if they tend toward finding funders that are more conservative &#8211; which this current Director of Komen seems likely to do, Komen will have found an official way not to fund Planned Parenthood and to Pass the buck. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/02/03/komen-news-not-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roe v. Wade&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/22/roe-v-wade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/22/roe-v-wade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; is 39 years old today, &#038; still, thankfully, the law of the land. It is not, of course, guaranteed, and the pro life forces are quite aware that the next presidential choice of a Supreme &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/22/roe-v-wade/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; is 39 years old today, &#038; still, thankfully, <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0410_0113_ZS.html">the law of the land.</a> It is not, of course, guaranteed, and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/roe-v-wade-at-39-a-breathtaking-year-for-abortion-restrictions/2012/01/22/gIQA6xodIQ_blog.html">the pro life forces are quite aware</a> that the next presidential choice of a Supreme Court justice is incredibly important, and they&#8217;re feeling pretty cocky after the 2010 elections.</p>
<p>So for those of you who are &#8220;fiscal conservatives&#8221; &#8211; I put that in quotes because I don&#8217;t think you can separate fiscal issues from social ones, since how we make and spend money, is, ultimately, a moral issue &#8211; who are thinking of voting against Obama, but who are feminists, think twice. </p>
<p>Being Pro Choice is not being Pro Abortion. I have yet to meet anyone &#8211; feminist or not &#8211; who is pro abortion. What we are, rather, is feminist, and think a woman&#8217;s life &#8211; which is actual, apparent, and breathing &#8211; should have at least some influence on the potential life &#8211; which is debatable, uncertain, and not breathing &#8211; she is carrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/22/roe-v-wade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Beautiful Is She?</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/14/how-beautiful-is-she/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/14/how-beautiful-is-she/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plus size model]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this. A &#8220;Plus Size&#8221; model &#8211; in scare quotes because I find the phrase idiotic &#8211; did a photo shoot with your average (skinny) model, exactly to show the difference. What&#8217;s striking to me &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/14/how-beautiful-is-she/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="plus size model" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/11/article-2085226-0F6A75F000000578-236_468x706.jpg" alt="" width="281" height="424" />I love this. A &#8220;Plus Size&#8221; model &#8211; in scare quotes because I find the phrase idiotic &#8211; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2085226/PLUS-Model-Magazines-Katya-Zharkova-cover-highlights-body-image-fashion-industry.html">did a photo shoot with your average (skinny) model</a>, exactly to show the difference.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s striking to me is how much she looks like an adult woman to the other model&#8217;s more child-like appearance. And honestly, that kind of freaks me out.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think she&#8217;s gorgeous.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/14/how-beautiful-is-she/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cho Fierce</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/13/cho-fierce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/13/cho-fierce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navel gazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margaret cho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Margaret Cho rightfully lost her shit &#38; in so doing wrote us all a manifesta: I grew up hard and am still hard and I don&#8217;t care. I did not choose this face or this &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/13/cho-fierce/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Margaret Cho rightfully lost her shit &amp; in so doing wrote us all a manifesta:<em><br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p><em> I grew up hard and am still hard and I don&#8217;t care. I did not choose this face or this body and I have learned to live with it and love it and celebrate it and adorn it with tremendous drawings from the greatest artists in the world and I feel good and powerful like a nation that has never been free and now after many hard won victories is finally fucking free. I am beautiful and I am finally fucking free.</em></p>
<p><em>I fly my flag of self-esteem for all those who have been told they were ugly and fat and hurt and shamed and violated and abused for the way they look and told time and time again that they were &#8220;different&#8221; and therefore unlovable. Come to me and I will tell you and show you how beautiful and loved you are and you will see it and feel it and know it and then look in the mirror and truly believe it. If you are offended by my anger and my might at defending my borders and my people you do not deserve entry into my beloved and magnificent country.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Read the <a href="http://jezebel.com/5875219/cho-mad-twitter">whole thing at Jezebel </a>or on <a href="http://www.margaretcho.com/content/2012/01/11/being-mad-on-twitter/">Cho&#8217;s blog.</a></p>
<p><strong>I am beautiful and I am finally fucking free. </strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ever let anyone tell you that you&#8217;re not pretty enough, that you curse too much, that you don&#8217;t like the right things, that you are &#8220;&#8216;different&#8217; and therefore unlovable&#8221;. They are only keeping you from your freedom.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s profoundly moving to see that someone like Margaret Cho &#8211; famous, funny, rude Margaret Cho &#8211; still needs to punch back so hard against someone who is telling her to be something other than what she is. Makes me feel an ounce better about having felt the need to do the same thing when I was told what I needed to do to fit in here. Sometimes I wonder if those of us who &#8220;grew up hard and am still hard&#8221; get read as a lot tougher than we are, &amp; so people feel free to critique when they might not if a person were obviously vulnerable. Hrm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2012/01/13/cho-fierce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Only Takes a Girl.</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/13/it-only-takes-a-girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/13/it-only-takes-a-girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women make 10% of the world&#8217;s income, but own only 1% of the world&#8217;s property while contributing 66% of the labor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YwEhKu3T51Q" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Women make 10% of the world&#8217;s income, but own only 1% of the world&#8217;s property while contributing 66% of the labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/13/it-only-takes-a-girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Condoms With Teeth</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/01/condoms-with-teeth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/01/condoms-with-teeth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, really. It&#8217;s almost something out of a feminist sci-fi: Women fearful of being raped can insert the Rape-Axe condom inside themselves like a diaphragm or tampon. If her worst fears come true, and a man &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/01/condoms-with-teeth/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2011/11/fb_0063d7be69cdbcbaa9c3999f21872e62.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="140" />No, really. It&#8217;s almost something out of a feminist sci-fi:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Women fearful of being raped can insert the Rape-Axe condom inside  themselves like a diaphragm or tampon. If her worst fears come true, and  a man attempts to rape her, the Rape-Axe&#8217;s inside hooks attach  themselves to the penis and don&#8217;t come off, instead getting even tighter  and stopping the man from being able to urinate. The only way to remove  it is by seeing a doctor—which will obviously help with prosecution.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Oddly enough, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5569537/condoms-with-teeth-fight-rape-in-south-africa">via Gizmodo.</a><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/12/01/condoms-with-teeth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes &amp; Misdemeanors</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/12/crimes-misdemeanors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/12/crimes-misdemeanors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Topeka, Kansas isn&#8217;t currently enforcing domestic violence laws put on the books to protect women. They say they can&#8217;t afford to. &#38; Honestly, I&#8217;d like to know when exactly we&#8217;re going to realize that our courts &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/12/crimes-misdemeanors/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Topeka, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspected-domestic-abusers-free-topeka-city-county-officials-161404729.html">Kansas isn&#8217;t currently enforcing domestic violence laws put on the books to protect women</a>. They say they can&#8217;t afford to.</p>
<p>&amp; Honestly, I&#8217;d like to know when exactly we&#8217;re going to realize that our courts are clogged with minor drug offenses instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/12/crimes-misdemeanors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bechdel Test</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/09/the-bechdel-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/09/the-bechdel-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article on women characters in movies &#8211; skip to the end &#8211; is very funny. I think her Ethereal Weirdo is my favorite, although I will admit to having women like her. They&#8217;re usually stoners. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/09/the-bechdel-test/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2011/10/03/111003sh_shouts_kaling?currentPage=all">This article on women characters in movie</a>s &#8211; skip to the end &#8211; is very funny. I think her Ethereal Weirdo is my favorite, although I will admit to having women like her. They&#8217;re usually stoners. I&#8217;ve always thought of her as the Cortazar <em>Hopscotch</em> fantasy woman, because I dated a guy who actually admitted, out loud, that he fell in love with the woman in that novel when he read it.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>This girl can’t be pinned down and may or may not show up when you make concrete plans with her. She wears gauzy blouses and braids. She likes to dance in the rain and she weeps uncontrollably if she sees a sign for a missing dog or cat. She might spin a globe, place her finger on a random spot, and decide to move there. The Ethereal Weirdo appears a lot in movies, but nowhere else. If she were from real life, people would think she was a homeless woman and would cross the street to avoid her. But she is essential to the male fantasy that even if a guy is boring he deserves a woman who will find him fascinating and perk up his dreary life by forcing him to go skinny-dipping in a stranger’s pool.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>But no post about women in film is complete without Bechdel&#8217;s <em>Test for Women in Movies</em>: </p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bLF6sAAMb4s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Some days it&#8217;s hard to come up with any that do pass the test. Help me out, readers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/09/the-bechdel-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Park Slope Cops</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/08/park-slope-cops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/08/park-slope-cops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[park slope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a rapist in my old hood of Park Slope, and the NYPD are completely fucking up the investigation. They&#8217;re following women home without identifying themselves and asking them about their clothes. It&#8217;s unbelievably obnoxious, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/08/park-slope-cops/">More<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a rapist in my old hood of Park Slope, and the NYPD are completely fucking up the investigation. They&#8217;re following women home without identifying themselves and <strong>asking them about their clothes</strong>. It&#8217;s unbelievably obnoxious, staggering in its stupidity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/nypd-train-your-cops-to-blame-rapists-for-rape-not-victims?utm_source=action_alert&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;alert_id=AeNyWSAHZL_CclKxGRjtE">So sign the petition from change.org to get the Chief of Ds to pay attention.</a><span id="more-12429"></span></p>
<p>Since the early spring, there have been 11 sexual assaults, including one rape, in Park Slope and surrounding neighborhoods.</p>
<p>In response the NYPD has released information about at least three suspects, including multiple videos and composite sketches, and increased police presence in the area. While we applaud the police for taking the attacks seriously, neighborhood residents are concerned with some aspects of the police response.</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that officers are telling women not to wear shorts or skirts to prevent being assaulted. This is victim-blaming, not prevention. This approach is indicative of a police force that is effectively disconnected from the community and unaffected by the current outcry and mass mobilizations against rape and victim blaming provoked by a Toronto police officer’s declaration that “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.”</p>
<p>Safe Slope, a Brooklyn-based collective formed in response to the attacks, recently chronicled additional worrying NYPD behavior, including:</p>
<p>- Officers following women home at night without communicating with them and showing video of the attacks to residents without warning, both practices that are frightening and triggering to sexual assault survivors.</p>
<p>- Only providing information about the assaults to women, which sends the message that men and genderqueer people aren’t sexually assaulted &#8211; a dangerous myth &#8211; and that sexual assault prevention is a women’s issue rather than the responsibility of the entire community.</p>
<p>- Only providing prevention and information materials in English, which prevents non-English speaking members of the community from receiving safety tips and information they need to protect themselves.</p>
<p>These missteps are the latest examples of a police department that is unprepared to responsibly and effectively prevent rape and sexual assault. A police force that is hurting those it is supposed to protect, particularly some of the most vulnerable members of society, is an outrage and an affront to the civil and human rights of all and requires action at all levels. Systemic victim-blaming leaves all people, but especially historically marginalized members of society, more susceptible to violence and arrest when they report rape or sexual assault to the police. We must build an analysis of police behavior, recklessness, lack of sensitivity and lack of adequate training as a systemic problem that has a significantly negative impact on those affected by violence and their communities.</p>
<p>In two recent incidents, two NYPD officers were accused of rape &#8211; and convicted of official misconduct for repeatedly entering the home of a woman without cause &#8211; and another officer was apprehended while committing a sexual assault. Videos have also been circulating of police violence at the Occupy Wall Street protests, adding to public mistrust of the NYPD and its motives, tactics, and actions.</p>
<p>We, the undersigned, call on Commissioner Ray Kelly to enact these steps immediately in regard to the situation in Park Slope:</p>
<p>- Immediately order sensitivity training for all officers assigned to work on the Park Slope case, to be completed by October 15th</p>
<p>- Ensure officers provide information about sexual assaults and prevention in Spanish and other languages reflective of community needs</p>
<p>- Ensure information on sexual assault be provided to individuals who are not female-bodied people</p>
<p>- Insist NYPD officers identify themselves and inform people who are being followed home</p>
<p>We further call on Commissioner Kelly to:</p>
<p>- Insist all NYPD officers complete mandatory sensitivity training by January 1st, 2012.</p>
<p>- Facilitate a safe and violence-free SlutWalk in New York City on Saturday October 1, 2011 with zero instances of police brutality or unwarranted police force.</p>
<p>Signed by:<br />
Hollaback!<br />
The Line Campaign<br />
Permanent Wave<br />
Safe Slope<br />
The organizers of SlutWalk NYC<br />
Women in Media and News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/10/08/park-slope-cops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grrrl Power Mash-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/09/30/grrrl-power-mash-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/09/30/grrrl-power-mash-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=12388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love it i love it i love it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rm-SlFSdUMY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>i love it i love it i love it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2011/09/30/grrrl-power-mash-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

