<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morehouse Crossdressing Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/</link>
	<description>helen boyd&#039;s journal of gender &#38; trans issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:17:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDog</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62884</link>
		<dc:creator>DDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62884</guid>
		<description>Apparently, a male-bodied person wearing a dress is unprofessional, period. It&#039;s an argument I&#039;ve encountered many times in business/networking workshops and seminars, and no one can give me a better answer than &quot;It&#039;s just not professional.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, a male-bodied person wearing a dress is unprofessional, period. It&#8217;s an argument I&#8217;ve encountered many times in business/networking workshops and seminars, and no one can give me a better answer than &#8220;It&#8217;s just not professional.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helenboyd</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62883</link>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62883</guid>
		<description>we don&#039;t know anything about the people who are crossdressing. the school seemed to assume they were gay &amp; this was a &quot;lifestyle&quot; issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we don&#8217;t know anything about the people who are crossdressing. the school seemed to assume they were gay &amp; this was a &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Véronique</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62882</link>
		<dc:creator>Véronique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62882</guid>
		<description>Are we sure they&#039;re trans?  Might they be femme gay men?  Even if I were early in transition, I would not want to attend an all-male college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we sure they&#8217;re trans?  Might they be femme gay men?  Even if I were early in transition, I would not want to attend an all-male college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cldrewski</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62881</link>
		<dc:creator>cldrewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62881</guid>
		<description>If only 3 of the Safe Space-rs voted against it, chances are it will not be anyone from that group who speaks up for the above mentioned peeps (straight CDs, pre-transition MTF, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only 3 of the Safe Space-rs voted against it, chances are it will not be anyone from that group who speaks up for the above mentioned peeps (straight CDs, pre-transition MTF, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helenboyd</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62880</link>
		<dc:creator>helenboyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62880</guid>
		<description>yep. &quot;the&quot; gay organization, &amp; only three people in it objected.

which has given plenty of people the old &quot;um, guys, could you not throw the trans people under the bus?&quot; complaint.

though of course whether or not trans women should be at an all male college is another issue entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep. &#8220;the&#8221; gay organization, &#038; only three people in it objected.</p>
<p>which has given plenty of people the old &#8220;um, guys, could you not throw the trans people under the bus?&#8221; complaint.</p>
<p>though of course whether or not trans women should be at an all male college is another issue entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDog</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2009/10/20/morehouse-crossdressing-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-62879</link>
		<dc:creator>DDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=9182#comment-62879</guid>
		<description>Wait, an administrator met with &quot;the&quot; gay organization, and only three people out of twenty-seven (including, I&#039;m sure, the administrator) said this was a bad idea? That bothers me.

The wording also implies that if the organization had voted against it, they wouldn&#039;t have released the policy. Which, somehow, I doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, an administrator met with &#8220;the&#8221; gay organization, and only three people out of twenty-seven (including, I&#8217;m sure, the administrator) said this was a bad idea? That bothers me.</p>
<p>The wording also implies that if the organization had voted against it, they wouldn&#8217;t have released the policy. Which, somehow, I doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

