<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indian FTMs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2007/09/09/indian-ftms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2007/09/09/indian-ftms/</link>
	<description>helen boyd&#039;s journal of gender &#38; trans issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:17:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grvsmth</title>
		<link>http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/2007/09/09/indian-ftms/comment-page-1/#comment-34758</link>
		<dc:creator>grvsmth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhusbandbetty.com/?p=1671#comment-34758</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, and it&#039;s sad that both trans spectra are being so badly treated by those in power.

I don&#039;t know what the life of the hijras was like before colonization, but from everything I&#039;ve read the life of hijras, fa&#039;afafine, muxe, ladyboys and travestis is just as much of a gender straitjacket as any other gender category.  All of these &quot;third genders&quot; are expected to be attracted to and have sex with men, but are rarely allowed the full privileges of marriage and motherhood.  In fact, it almost seems more rigid than a gender binary, because in a gender binary male-bodied femmes can find a place of their own in a whole category of queer nonconformists.  I wrote about this in my blog:

http://transblog.grieve-smith.com/?p=43</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, and it&#8217;s sad that both trans spectra are being so badly treated by those in power.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the life of the hijras was like before colonization, but from everything I&#8217;ve read the life of hijras, fa&#8217;afafine, muxe, ladyboys and travestis is just as much of a gender straitjacket as any other gender category.  All of these &#8220;third genders&#8221; are expected to be attracted to and have sex with men, but are rarely allowed the full privileges of marriage and motherhood.  In fact, it almost seems more rigid than a gender binary, because in a gender binary male-bodied femmes can find a place of their own in a whole category of queer nonconformists.  I wrote about this in my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://transblog.grieve-smith.com/?p=43" rel="nofollow">http://transblog.grieve-smith.com/?p=43</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

